Diego:
Hello Don. Thank you for taking time to answer a
few questions that I have had after reviewing
your writings about positive music on the dovesong.com
web site.
Although you don’t say that positive music is
happy music, I would like to know what is
happiness for you, and what is the role of music
in your idea of a happy life?
Don:
The term positive doesn’t just apply to happy music. Sad music is positive
too, if you think about it. Sadness, happiness,
joy, love, peace, these are all positive
emotions, and positive music conveys these
emotions. Negative music, however, is music that
coveys negative emotions, such as hatred and
anger. Positive music uplifts, promotes healing,
is heartfelt, or spiritual. Negative music has
an opposite effect, supporting confusion, anger,
stress and nervousness.
Life
isn’t always happy, nor is it meant to be, but
when one observes the genuine happiness of
children at play, one realizes how natural this
state really is. This happiness of a child is
genuine, unlike the strained “smiley faces”
that people in the business world sometimes
wear. What has caused so many adults to loose
this natural state of happiness? The answer is
that blocks, created in the mind and emotions, hold back the natural flow
of love, joy and happiness. As life deals out
obstacles along the way, emotional scars result.
And as people educate themselves in the standard
operating procedures of worldly society, they
accept very limiting mental concepts that hold
back the flow of spontaneous ideas, such as a
young child always has. If a person hasn’t
managed to preserve or recover a state of
childlike innocence, then happiness becomes a
concept, and one tends to try to attain it
through outward means, or by taking substances
that give some seeming relief from troubling
mental patterns and painful emotional scars.
Happy
music won’t help a person much if he or she
has filled himself with doubt, anger, hatred,
guilt, and such things. But music does help
provide a lift for people who are open to it. I
don’t know how it is in your country of
Argentina, but during the 1950s when I was
growing up in the USA, many people used to
stroll along the streets whistling happy tunes.
Beside the fact that not many people walk along
our streets any more, I rarely hear people
whistling. Of course, many of the popular songs
today do not have melodies that would lend
themselves to whistling, and hip hop, which is
very popular here, has abandoned melody
altogether. But only particular types of
melodies invoke that instant happy
emotion…melodies such as Oh, What a
Beautiful Morning by Richard Rogers,
featured in the musical Oklahoma.
I don’t know if you are familiar with that
song. It has that kind of melody that people
liked to whistle during the early fifties. Zippity
Do Da from the Walt Disney motion picture Song
of the South, filmed during the 1940s, even
featured a whistled solo, where Uncle Remus
walked along the path near his home as animated
bluebirds landed on his shoulder. My, what a
difference between a masterpiece like this from
the late 1940s--no longer available in the
United States--and most of the standard product
released by the Hollywood studios today! Have we
lost our virginity? In our current jaded
society, many people do not believe happiness is
even an option. That is just not true.
Diego:
Do you think that it is possible to live without
angry feelings? I ask you because I’ve read an
article where Brian Eno talks about some new age
music, and it seemed to him that the music
wasn’t real, because it didn’t have any evil
in it. Do you think that a life without angry or
evil feelings is unreal or not possible to live?
Don:
Some people feel that art should reflect real
life and therefore have some degree of darkness
in it. But why do they consider that a necessary
component of music? Should we add a few discords
to an Ave
Maria to make it more genuine?
People
listen to music for different reasons. Some want
to gain knowledge or envision an experience by
relating to the words. Others enjoy the physical
reaction from the beat, from the groove.
Some appreciate music for intellection
stimulation, or for entertainment, while others
like to connect with music emotionally, or even
deeper, with their feelings. We can use music to
help us connect with what is real inside of us.
If we are looking for the very same elements in
music that we encounter in our (perhaps tired,
stressed out and troubled) lives, then we are
probably not using music to help us connect with
our true inner natures.
Music
can offer something that adds to our daily
lives, something to lift us beyond the mundane
world, but how we appreciate it? Is it our
emotional, physical, mental, and/or spiritual
natures that we allow to absorb the vibrations
of music? If it is our spiritual nature, then
only a certain kind of music is really
effective. I am not talking about some of the
contemporary gospel and Christian music that is
only that same, tired superficial music from pop
radio with quasi-spiritual lyrics added. I am
talking about good, get-down-inside-and-feel-it
spiritual music. God knows that this kind of
medicine is desperately needed today, at least
for those who are ready for it. That is why I so
strongly recommend Renaissance sacred and North
Indian classical music, two very, very great
traditions of spiritually uplifting music.
Please
take note, however, that I am not talking about
escaping from reality here; I am talking about
attuning ourselves to a higher sound vibration.
If we lift ourselves high enough, we will no
longer be concerned with “evil” anymore
(laughs). Each of us has a choice of how we want
to live our lives. If we want to feel angry and
frustrated, there are lots of CDs that we will
feel compatible with. But then there is music of
light and love too. It is all there to choose
from. We are not talking about denying evil, or
denying anger, nor are we talking about living a
life without anger. It is not about manipulating
how we feel. It is about growing spiritually and
discovering the great hidden treasure that is
YOU and ME…allowing it unfold, like a flower,
its pedals gradually opening.
Diego:
You have studied the relations between music and
spirituality, what did you find out about our
society, since there is such a preponderance of
negative music?
Don:
Society is generally very troubled and
happiness, joy and love cannot be forced on a
troubled society. Young people have created much
of the music that is popular around the world,
as you know, and it often expresses their
alienation and resentment. I have received
emails from young people going through puberty
who consider their omnipresent anger and hatred
as a normal part of the puberty process.
However, the fact is that they are angry because
they are growing up in a troubled environment,
one where they are unable to relate to their
parents--who have lost their own spark of youth,
becoming afraid instead; where they are told
that sex and their own bodies are unnatural and
should be hidden and forbidden; and where they
grow up eating the worst possible commercially
prepared food, heated in microwaves, or picked
up at the drive-up window at junk-food
restaurants. Then they are given preposterous
goals to attain, little concerned with their own
feelings, likes and dislikes. Add to this the
hours and hours they spend watching television
programming filled with platitude and violence.
Finally, with all the discouragement that
surrounds them, they are given very little hope
from those around them. With little expression
of love in their lives, many young people are
confused and have taken to drugs. One of the
results from all of this is their music…the
hip-hop, the punk, the industrial and heavy
metal records, their music of anger and
frustration. And we have heard it for so long
that it has become the background music for our
society, a society grown dispirited and
troubled. It is there in the background at
restaurants, on the radios, in the TV
commercials, at dances. I would like to comment,
however, that I did not mean to infer that
dysfunctional family problems are present in
every family…there are still many very stable
families and homes, but what I have described
has become the dominant theme in current society
in the Western world, and much of the music that
this society produces, and many of the motion
pictures, are based on these problems. The
resultant media continue to influence the other
cultures of the world.
Diego:
When you were involved in new age music, what
were the elements in it that made you feel
unsatisfied? What artists in that area you
respect and what of them not and why?
Don:
When I started out in 1969 with my first album, Dawn,
new age music was something conceptual that I
read about in books. I felt that with the
psychedelic movement of the 1960s underfoot,
definite positive changes were taking place in
society, because a new, healing, spiritual music
was being introduced. The force behind all of
this at that time was North Indian classical music, brought to the Western world by people
like Ravi Shankar, and this influence was
responsible for very positive changes in popular
music, classical music and jazz. During the
1960s, we had some of the greatest pop music
ever, created by groups like the Beatles, but
soon popular music changed course. Back in 1969,
I had hoped that music would become more
uplifting and positive, and this is what I
envisioned new age music to be. But instead I
realized that it was becoming more negative. At
the end of the 1970s, a separate genre of music
started to become established in the San
Francisco Bay area. Called new age music, it was
produced by a handful of musicians with the aim
of creating a spiritual and relaxing music. The
genre grew each year until finally in the mid
1980s, the new age genre became internationally
recognized. When the major labels and the radio
stations got involved, the genre changed
completely. Today, it seems to be dominated by
music that has no relationship to the original
conception of new age music. I will have a lot
more to say about this topic in my forthcoming
book on positive music.
Diego:
Do you feel yourself to be a member of what
Marilyn Ferguson called the Aquarian Conspiracy?
Don:
When I left California and moved to Colorado in
1984, I was making a definite break with the new
age community in and around San Francisco,
including the musicians. During the late 1970s
and early 1980s, the term new age music meant to me something entirely different than an
association with a kind of movement, as I
explained. My feeling about the new age movement
and the so-called Aquarian conspiracy is that I
question the validity of the idea of a new age
now taking place. Therefore, I don’t see a
reason for a new age movement. The idea of our
planetary culture shifting into a different age,
one of peace, prosperity and spirituality, comes
from astrology and Plato’s Great
Year of 25,920 years that represents the
number of years that it takes for the equinox to
pass through the twelve signs of the zodiac,
with each sign becoming a strong influence on
society for 2,160 years. The preceding age was
the Piscean, and the one we are now moving into
is the Aquarian. Since these periods are each
2,160 years in length, and we are only in the
last 100 years entering the sign of Aquarius, I
do not believe that we need to get too excited
about a whole new age of enlightenment just yet.
What I noticed when I lived in California, and
the concept of a new age movement was spreading,
was that people, high on pot and LSD, were
living in their own little worlds, surrounded by
new age music, visuals and like-minded friends.
They were living a fantasy life, as if the
transformation into a new age had already
occurred. The rest of the world was living in
darkness and therefore their personal tragedies
were the result of their own thinking, they told
me. I cannot deny the power of thought, but it
was because of their own thinking that people
were starving in Bangladesh, for example, so
therefore, there was no need to regard them. It
also appeared that for every sincere person who
attended new age events, there were at least
five people who were in it for the money and the
glamour. I began to see that so many of the
people in new age circles in California, where
the whole thing started, were mired in
selfishness, even though they may have acquired
some degree of spiritual attainment, and I was
very troubled by what I saw taking place. For
this reason and others, I left California, where
I had first been attracted by the psychedelic
movement of the 1960s.
The
so-called new age movement has become a religion
in the eyes of many, and I do not feel that this
is productive. We don’t need another religion.
There are too many as it is! Religions create
separation. For every religion, there are other
religions that arm themselves against that
religion, and this, as we well know, ends up in
war and disagreement. The new age movement has
already spawned a whole movement against it
among the right-wing Christian fundamentalists
who have become influenced by a plethora of
books filled with misinformation, books that
claim to explain to Christians what the
so-called new age movement is all about. We need
to learn to understand each other instead of
constantly looking for things we think we
disagree about. But this is the way of the
world, and it has been this way for thousands of
years. I don’t see the situation changing
anytime soon. Is it that much different now than
during the time of the crusades, or during the
inquisition? We still kill each other because of
religion. When are we all going to realize that
religion is man-made and that truth is God-made
and it is the truth we are looking for, not
religion?
Diego:
What was the cause of your leaving all negative
music in your life? Has what causes you to be
angry disappeared in your life? Was it a
necessity of being part of the “positive
vibrations”, as spiritual feelings were called
in sixties?
Don:
I made a decision to leave negative music when I
realized what it was. In 1968, I was composing
music that was stripped of consonance, and at
the same time I was playing rock music that
crescendoed into a frenzy of terrifying noise.
It was difficult at first to stop conceiving of
this music because I had gotten so heavily
involved in it. After the release of my first
album Dawn in 1969, my ex-wife and I went to Mexico where we lived for
about six months. There, on the sands in front
of our beachfront Mayan hut on the Yucatan
Peninsula, I allowed myself to become purified
from the extremely negative music that I had
been involved in during the previous years. As I
became more spiritually awakened in the
following years, the negative music that I had
formerly embraced became painful for me to
experience.
As
far as getting angry, I used to get upset really
easily, but I don’t get angry much any more.
Once in a while somebody says something that I
will get upset about. But if I allow myself to
get upset, then I end up paying the price for
it, because I have to work to get back out of
the state that I have gotten myself into. What I
do is deal with the cause of the anger by
getting down inside and looking at it. Usually
it ends up being some emotional scar that I have
not yet worked out, perhaps something from my
childhood.
Diego:
What do you like about psychedelic music in
sixties? Which part of that story do you
consider positive and which do you not? You can
talk about drugs if want. But I would like to
know what records of that time you consider
healthy experiences and what carried negative
vibrations and the worst, pulsing of death. In
the same matter why so many musicians opened the
hell doors instead of heavens doors at that
time?
Don:
In the mid-1960s, there were group psychedelic
experiences that took place at concerts in the
Fillmore Auditorium and the Family Dog in San
Francisco, and these were awesome. I don’t
think anyone could put these experiences into
words, and so they will probably die without a
history. Based on psychedelic experiences, the
inappropriately named hippie era was
short-lived. These days of love and flowers were
fleeting, a kind of omen, and that is all. They
awakened a few, but also took a lot of
casualties. I believe that those who tried to
cling to psychedelics, after their initial
impact in the sixties, realized only a shadow of
what they had originally experienced, if that
even. One cannot take heaven by storm.
The
most amazing band that played during the flower
power era in San Francisco was, in my opinion,
the Thirteenth
Floor Elevators, but they burned out
extremely fast on account of the psychedelics,
and their lead singer was soon confined to a
mental institution. The song Slip
Inside this House
embodies the mystery teachings in the
lyric, and I have never heard another song like
it. The Grateful
Dead could create an amazing atmosphere with
their music that would become transforming while
under the influence of psychedelics, but then
they would suddenly plunge into the depths of
hell, pure chaos and discord.
The
Haight District in San Francisco became
inundated with outsiders from all over the
continent during the summer of 1969, and the
more mellow hippies left the city in droves for
counties further north, and to Mexico. The
outsiders brought drugs like heroin and speed
with them. When I returned to San Francisco from
my six-month hiatus in Mexico in late 1969, I
found people who had previously been on a
spiritual path using LSD and mushrooms now were
addicted to heroin and speed. They nervously
talked about devils and satin and were listening
to hard-edged music like Hendrix, the Stones and
Led Zeppelin instead of Ravi Shankar and the
Beatles. Why did the musicians open the doors to
hell? They were connecting with the psychic
world using drugs, a very dangerous thing. It is
really just that simple. Few of them knew what
they were doing. People who considered
themselves flower children became angry and
dark. That is what happened. I was there. There
is no door to nirvana through drugs. It is up to
each of us to find the way on our own. And we
are always shown the way when we really ask, and
we are truly sincere.
The
band that I acknowledge from that era, and that
I will always recommend, is the Moody
Blues from England. They embodied the
“light side of the force” during the period
when psychedelic drugs mixed with other drugs
were opening the door for all kinds of other
energies to enter rock music. I believe I have
listened to most all of the groups, and the
Moodies were the only ones that really embraced
the light. The five or six albums starting with Days
of Future Passed are clean and positive,
without the negativity that the drugs brought
into so much music and are really great
musically and spiritually. And if you understand
the lyrics, the story of the light side of the
era is described in the words of the songs.
Yes,
the rock musicians were playing with fire. When
I recognized this and understood the nature of
what was being unleashed, the dark side, you
could say, I left San Francisco and moved to a
farmhouse in Southern Colorado where I wrote
about my experiences and predicted that a period
of negative rock music lay just ahead. That was
1970. It turned out that my prediction was
correct.
Diego:
How did you come to the idea of working for
positive music and how did you get the idea of
creating dovesong.com and the DoveSong
Foundation? How is the site doing and what
reactions have you received.
Don:
I have been promoting positive music since 1968,
the year that I discovered the difference
between music that was uplifting and music that
was not. I started the DoveSong website (